Anti-Social Media: Spin a win!

The Senate hearing this week on P660 million in loans that the Development Bank of the Philippines granted businessman Roberto Ongpin was a doozy.

The ABS-CBN News Channel broadcast the hearings live for a while but gave up when viewers began zoning out during the discussion on behest loans and stocks and banking principles that lasted for hours.

Even the news websites, usually on fire with breaking news whenever the Senate holds hearings, were oddly silent.

Reporters and editors either found the story too boring or too confusing for blow-by-blow accounts.

Behind the scenes, though, things were slightly more exciting. Two independent sources told Indolent Indio that a reporter not usually assigned to the Senate was there for the hearing.

The reporter was not there to cover the hearing. He was there to make sure it was covered right. And by right, we mean, the way the reporter’s principal wanted it covered.

The reporter is said to have gone the rounds of the Senate press office to offer his colleagues money in exchange for making it look like Ongpin engaged in insider trading and in bypassing the DBP’s rules on loan applications.

We do not know if Ongpin, former President Ferdinand Marcos’s old crony and trusted adviser, was shown preferential treatment by the DBP through loans that were processed and released within two weeks after they were filed.

We do know that somebody wants the public to think so.

The reporter, our sources say, is from a broadsheet with an office in the port area. Hypocritically (but not ironically), he usually files stories from a government branch charged with being fair and impartial.

We’re not ones to judge, but reporting and PR work should not go hand in hand.

Granted, Ongpin got rich by pandering to Marcos while he was trade secretary of the Marcos and Pals Club, but nailing him with unproven allegations is no way to bring him before the bar of justice. Which, incidentally, is where Rascally Reporter can usually be found.

Bankers behaving badly

Although not quite as rich, it seems employees of this US-based banking firm have learned to party like bankers from the 1980s.

According to our sources, these hotshot bankers held one of their “team-building” activities at a hotel in Manila and left the place in shambles. Not content with smoking on a non-smoking floor, they also peed all over the rented function room and covered the floor in multi-colored vomit.

 

It is not known if they also did coke lines on the backs of Pasay City prostitutes but once you cross the line and pee in the same room that you are having drinks in, all bets are off. To be fair, some of them did try to make it to the toilets. They just forgot to hold their pee until they got there.

Hang on, those guys aren't bankers!

No, the dudes in that picture are not bankers. And neither were the employees of that multi-national banking corporation, strictly speaking. Answering phones and doing back-end technical support for the banking industry does not make you a banker. It only makes you cheap labor. Acting otherwise and giving service staff a hard time makes you even cheaper.

Anti-Social Media: Think before you dick

This online editor better start thinking real quick and stop clicking Like buttons on Facebook.

Why?

Two staff members are about to hit send buttons on emails indicating their resignations.

This after only working six months or so for the news website that he supposedly heads.

What could be wrong in the office? Is it because the editor-in-chief is an award-winning journalist and is always willing to tell everyone about it? Or is it because the boss doesn’t make any mistakes at all, despite questionable news judgment?

No one knows. And apparently, no one cares, not even the top brass.

As a result, more than 40 or so employees have resigned in the past two years–a figure enough to fill up the current staff.

Exodus! Movement of Jah people!

Among those who left are two who have defected to another network, one who turned NGO, and one assistant who supposedly ran away with money. How much? Again, no one knows.

But one thing is clear: the company certainly wrote 30–or is it 20?–to that.